<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criticism &#8211; Is It Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://r2blog.com/2009/03/08/criticism-is-it-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://r2blog.com/2009/03/08/criticism-is-it-good/</link>
	<description>Thoughts 4 U</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:39:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Burnett</title>
		<link>http://r2blog.com/2009/03/08/criticism-is-it-good/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Burnett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronaldrogers.wordpress.com/?p=595#comment-66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tis more blessed to give than receive!

Actually I have received a good bit of criticism over the years and I don&#039;t mind constructive criticism and mostly find it useful.  Like everything else tho, whether or not it is constructive  is often in the eye of the beholder. 

What I particularly don&#039;t like is criticism that is offered as or labeled by the critic as constructive but in reality is given by someone that likes  to criticize just for the pure pleasure they get out of tearing one down.  They don&#039;t really care if the person being criticized actually improves, they just want to point out weakness or mistakes to make sure  everyone else sees the weakness or mistake.  I have noticed that the older I  get, the less tolerant I am toward to folks like this and I might even resort to name calling and some negative discussion of their family tree and parentage.  :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tis more blessed to give than receive!</p>
<p>Actually I have received a good bit of criticism over the years and I don&#8217;t mind constructive criticism and mostly find it useful.  Like everything else tho, whether or not it is constructive  is often in the eye of the beholder. </p>
<p>What I particularly don&#8217;t like is criticism that is offered as or labeled by the critic as constructive but in reality is given by someone that likes  to criticize just for the pure pleasure they get out of tearing one down.  They don&#8217;t really care if the person being criticized actually improves, they just want to point out weakness or mistakes to make sure  everyone else sees the weakness or mistake.  I have noticed that the older I  get, the less tolerant I am toward to folks like this and I might even resort to name calling and some negative discussion of their family tree and parentage.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
